lorem ipsum
Add an image
Add a link
go back to maingo to old version
load more posts . . .
May 31, 2004 -- 8:59 PM
posted by Par
- Some interesting web services today. But first, the article prompting a look at this: Googlopoly: A Market Free-For-All. Apparently, free search engines are bringing down the world and causing a global cancer epidemic... or something.
- Mailinator.com - provides free temporary e-mail addresses
- BugMeNot.com - provides logins for free registration sites; bypassing all the demographic information
Anyway, two services that are brought up by this:
Whether these services conform to acceptable net standards is up to you. I find it interesting that they exist. Once again, someone steps up and fills the void, as it were. Of course, they are not without controversy. The ethics of bypassing registration data vs. the ethics of collecting demographic data and infringing on the privacy of browsers. (For the record, BugMeNot.com does not add pay sites to its database, only registration sites. Any pay sites found can be removed.)
Speaking of net controversy (and from a bit of a biased standpoint), there's an interesting article on Informit.com about the new browser wars. This is more of a standards war than Netscape vs. Internet Explorer, but your choices are at the center of this battle. Of course, laziness has dictated the choice thus far, with IE taking 95% of market share, simply because it is prepackaged. Of course, for security, customizability and usability, the competition blows IE out of the water. This article does not so much delve into this part of the debate, but does give pause about how important the browser is in the online industry. Despite what any company decides, it is your choices that will dictate the explosion of P2P, the implosion of Real Player and everything in between.
And, because I'm not all serious, but scary too, here's the Internet Furry Proximity Locator. Now you, too, can find out how close this disturbing net phenomenon has come to you! (If you don't know what a furry is, be glad. (Although I'm sure sooner or later, someone will explain it to you (I'm looking at you, NKMF.)))
May 31, 2004 -- 4:26 PM
posted by eric
- cool David Suzuki.org OECD stat there, but isn't 1999 kind of an outdated now?
peep the Billboard Charts from 1999 and you'll see what i'm getting at. (the ones in bold are the artists that hold the highest, "who'tha fuck?" factor)
1 Livin La Vida Loca, Ricky Martin
2 If You Had My Love, Jennifer Lopez
3 No Scrubs, TLC
4 Fortunate, Maxwell
5 Kiss Me, Sixpence None The Richer
6 Where My Girls At?, 702
7 Who Dat, JT Money Featuring Sole
8 That Don t Impress Me Much, Shania Twain
9 Every Morning, Sugar Ray
10 808, Blaque
May 31, 2004 -- 4:18 PM
posted by nobody knows my face
hey what the fuck!?!!! TRAIN 48 is the best television programming available!!!! A 'grade twoer' could tell you that shit.
May 31, 2004 -- 1:32 PM
posted by again!
- hmm... fuck
"According to a 1999 Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) study, Canada’s economy ranks 28th out of 29 industrialized countries in terms of energy efficiency. That means to generate a dollar of GDP our economy needs to use more energy than just about every other industrial country.
So, as energy prices increase - and that includes gasoline - Canada will be hit harder than most everyone else. And our competitiveness will suffer. Right now, our economy is predicated on having access to cheap and plentiful energy supplies. We are ill-equipped to deal with rising prices – yet that is exactly what the future bodes."

May 31, 2004 -- 1:25 PM
posted by alison
- uh, Taylor, do you actually watch that show? Train 48 is hideous.
yeah, yeah, election blah blah blah... TV, come on! Let's talk about something really exciting!
I think I've stopped watching television, it's just too terrible any more.
Except for the news, when all our favourite politicians are analysed in more ways than humanly possible...
god forbid a man with a moustache win anything, eh? What kind of news is that? lame-o
the newspaper isn't much better though, I have to admit.
Although the political cartoons this weekend were funny, check them out if you haven't... hellection haha!
May 31, 2004 -- 12:09 AM
posted by edo
You're right Paras, whats an election without some turmoil? I bet the Spanish are like "That was an Awesome election man!"... |
Anyways here is prime example of just how exciting Mr. Jack Layton is: Check it out , Zowee! |
Elections can be exciting... see, look how much they cost us: Past Costs and Projected |
May 31, 2004 -- 12:09 AM
posted by Par
- I dunno, Ed. I don't think an election is the same without the hired goons, inter-party violence (hell, even intra-party violence), and action movie stars.
Of course, this year your ballot is worth more than just a statistic for prognosticating political pundits on June 28th, it's also worth $1.75... to registered political parties:
Registered political parties that receive at least two percent of the number of valid votes cast nationally, or five percent of the number of valid votes cast in the electoral districts in which the registered party endorsed a candidate, will be eligible for a quarterly allowance which, on the basis of a full year, will amount to $1.75 per valid vote received by the party in the previous general election. -- Bill C-24
Also, isn't it nice to know that Elections Canada provides a toll-free number from Mexico, so that our Senators can also ask elections questions?
