Uh... maybe it's possible because of Gnomes?

An interesting comment arising out of a Slashdot poll on work dress code:


Is it possible to determine if someone has a porn problem, depending on percentage of total hard drive space devoted to porn? What's the intervention level? 15%? 75%?


Any thoughts?

peep this shit niggs:


Mulholland Dr. TV Pilot
2000 USA Color

The Unaired Pilot for the TV Show that would have been, had ABC not chickened out. Features a different plot, with characters and scenes not in the theatrical film. This edition also includes the
ultra-rare interviews with David Lynch, Naomi Watts, and
Laura Elena Harring, filmed by Canal Plus on the "Pool Party" set.

Quality is fairly good, considering the rarity of this material.
Total running time 125 minutes, in stereo.


Spinal Tap - The Complete Workprint
1984 USA Color

Here it is - the original 4 1/2 hour workprint of This Is Spinal Tap, containing elements and subplots which were abandoned for the theatrical release. Quality is fairly good considering the PAL transfer
and sheer rarity of the material - overall quite watchable
and highly recommended to hardcore Tap fans.

You can order this shit that don't even exist, from
www.brutallo.com/

as discovered through the Village Voice article
Das Bootlegs
Hunting down verboten DVDs and videos on the Internet
by Michael Atkinson


stay hip kids.

hmm, tempting... and it's nicer than Safari? (not that Safari's nice per se, but I'm just wondering what the gain is)

okay, so today's been all about filing, when I can actually raise enough energy to sit in front of the computer and do it. How the fuck can you have 12 copies of the same document all updated on different days? And some file folders with the same names and different content. How the fuck is this possible? I'd like to throttle Geneva. I think it's going to take the rest of the week to sort this all out, and it should've been done in May, but I didn't have time. This is horrendous. it's so bloody frustrating.

actaully, I got away with installing firefox on my computer at work. I just didn't tell anyone that I did it.

I dont' think I can just download a new browser to use on the SU's computer. Besides, I use Safari, but I'll try something else (meaning explorer). Honestly though, I don't think that's the problem. It's not like checking something out on a different browser changes what the messages look like (and I just checked to be sure). It's not yahoo mail, it's yahoo groups postings, but it shouldn't be that different, now should it? I mean really, why insert "=" signs into every line when all you need to do is bring the end over and start anew on the next line? It shouldn't be that hard. It's not like I hit "enter" at the end of every line or something.

grr!

Text wrapping is exactly what you describe, where the ... uh... text will be ... uh ... wrapped around the end of the text box, rather than displayed as one continuous line.

As for yahoo, it works for me. Obviously you don't use the word 'yahoo' enough in daily speech for it to work for you. (It could also be your browser. (I can't believe I'm suggesting this, but) try using IE and see if that works. Or, there's always Firefox (wink, wink, nudge, nudge))

hey, so computer whizzes:

what is "text wrapping"? and how can I get Yahoo to stop inserting "=" into the middle of words when the line must be broken. It's pissing me off, why can't they just alter the paragraph size like all other e-mail type systems do?

Atlantis?

a joke, rights reserved to Eric:

"Wild On Abu Ghraib"