Actually Paras, if you read my post, I thought I made it pretty clear that I was clarifying a point, not correcting Alison.

Al, no need for excessive apologizing, it's alright, we're cool yo. and i got the drift the first time anyways, regardless of what Jas-"hey Eric's such a fuckin' doormat"-on said (by the way, are you by chance from South Dakota?)
like i need some guy i don't know calling me a pushover. what the fuck.
i'm kidding.

no like seriously, what the fuck.
no i'm kidding.

no seriously.

BEST ALBUM OF 2005 (that's right, 2005):



FROM PITCHFORK NEWS:

Matt Amis reports:
James Murphy, the megalomaniacal genius behind New York production team/record company DFA, has been teasing us hip, glow-stick-swingin' dancepunks for months with infectious strains of booty-shakin' 12-inch singles. First, there was the anthemic "Losing My Edge" and the satirical brilliance of "Beat Connection", and around this time last year came the, uh, satirical brilliance of "Yeah". And just as we were beginning to foam at the mouth (maybe we should get a shot for that...) for more material, here comes the new action: The release of Murphy's full-length, all-new material debut as LCD Soundsystem.
Pitchfork spoke to DFA spokesman Jonathan Galkin yesterday via that wonder of modern engineering, the telephone, and he gave us the lowdown on the release. Galkin said that about 95% of the album is exclusively Murphy; he plays guitar, bass, drums, keyboards, and handled vocal tracking as well. Recorded at DFA Studios in New York City and Long View Farm Recording Studios in Massachusetts, the self-titled album has been tagged with a release date of February, 15, 2005. It's a Tuesday. Write it down. Stateside, the album will be released by Capitol Records.

Meanwhile, in the UK-- where those lucky Brits can get their hands on the LP on January 24-- the album has already spawned a single, "Movement". But if you're not into the whole "paying out the nose for import singles" thing, you'll be happy to learn that the B-side of that release, "Yr City's a Sucker", will receive an exclusive stateside release January 11th. The A-side will feature a vocal version of the song, with an instrumental on the B-side. According to Galkin, "Daft Punk Is Playing at My House" is expected to be released as the album's next single, and shooting for the track's video has already commenced. The B-side for that one will feature a remix of the title track by Belgian duo Soulwax. Galkin sums up their version as "a pretty straightforward party anthem," reminiscent of "The B-52s and Jon Spencer."

Galkin also talked a bit about the sound of the album. "It definitely incorporates everything that's influenced [Murphy]...it keeps with styles merging or styles influencing each other, where suddenly you didn't think Carl Craig and T. Rex could live in one track, and somehow they do. It sounds like James finally getting to everything that he always felt was special about tracks, like he got to spill his guts onto one record. It's very in keeping with what LCD has done in the past...It's James setting out to make a proper LP, a side A and a side B."

As previously reported, the release showcases nine tracks, none of which have yet been officially released ("Never as Tired as When I'm Waking Up" is not to be confused with "Tired", the B-side of LCD's "Give It Up" single). Tracklist:

01 Daft Punk Is Playing at My House
02 Too Much Love
03 Tribulations
04 Movement
05 Never As Tired As When I'm Waking Up
06 On Repeat
07 Thrills
08 Disco Infiltrator
09 The Great Release

So to say that only non-sinner can be Christian is incorrect, if so, there would be no Christians at all.

Actually, Mary, I think that was Alison's point. Just as there would be no Christians under such circumstances, similarly there would be no environmentalists if their arguments could be dismissed by "well, you're living on farmland, so saying acquiring farmland is bad is hypocritical, therefore you aren't a true environmentalist, and you should fix your own habits before you criticize mine." (There's a similar, facetious argument used against vegetarianism that always irks me.)


Were you among those who didn't vote in the senator-in-waiting election? Well, you'll love this. The Premier is meeting with the winners of that election to discuss their current role. Options include paying them (don't we pay enough senators to do no work, Andrew Thompson?) and sending them to Ottawa to to act as vocal critics of the present Senate system. Apparently, the nearly 30% of voters who came out to vote and refused to vote for senators be damned; we're going to pay them to lobby for a political platform issue!

It's bullshit like this that almost makes me forget that Ezra Levant (a.k.a. The Northern Ann Coulter) argued that disregarding missile defence because it involves weaponization of space is foolish because "space is already weaponized; ICBMs fly through space!"

Checkit. This is the reason I did not sleep tonight. It's a shitty website at best. But hey... for one night, who's complaining? (that news is all fake: I didn't work on it that long! heheh)

Luckily I started working on a portfolio page a while back so I just dug this up and finished it off. Man, what a shitty job. I'm gonna get a terrible mark because the content is so lacking. but whatevs. done is done.

Who the hell is this Grand Arms Kampfer person? Sound like a good idea for Grand Arms though. I'll make a whole line of them like Kamen rider or Ultraman, they'll all have special powers and abilities and instead of just Panzer there'll be a whole bunch of them. There could even be a Grand Arms Chrono who could control time even facilitate time travel... Whoa! Reverse De ja Vu... Is that called a vision?

Since I'll be going back to the future soon I'll leave you guys with some advice. Study hard for your finals or you'll all fail! Those not writing final, don't drink too much or you'll get something called beer belly. To the guys you'll all go bald so get use to it. For the girls, the guys won't get much more mature then right now so get use to us. I'm off!

Alison, I wasn't trying to say that because you happen to live within a situation you have no right to comment on it, and I'm sorry if I came across that way. I think that maybe the problem with posting things of this nature online is that it's difficult to start a dialouge of any kind or ask any questions without what you are saying seeming like an attack. That isn't how I intended it. I'm sure if we'd been having the conversation in person, we could have resolved it nicely in the space of about 5 seconds.

As for the rest...and I know this wasn't what you were saying in your post...I'm just going to take a couple of lines to clear up some misconceptions. Christians are supposed to try and live their lives in a way that honours God, but they screw up. Christians don't believe that only non-Christians are sinners, they believe that EVERYBODY, Christian, or non-Christian is a sinner. And human. And fallible. That's why Christians still do everything everyone else does - they're still human. So to say that only non-sinner can be Christian is incorrect, if so, there would be no Christians at all.

Just had to get that out...

How come when I decide to post again everyone start talking about violence? You know what screw what that Jason guy had to say. He was some random person who didn't know what he was talking about. Damn if I wasn't depressed though, I had to finish the mother of all engineering reports. Sorry once again Eric, I was bored and I shouldn't of acted that way. Throwing my 2 cents in for the Hi-Md debate, I'd have to say it is a case of over-engineering. What I mean is it is fully capable and in many ways superior to a i-pod but the common person can't appreciate it. They want a quick no fuss device like a i-pod which facillitates a user friendly interface aka the scrolly wheel. The Hi-Md from what I see is not that more complicated to use but the layperson may be scared off by the "tech" and features that the Hi-Md has availabel to it. I've always been a tech person so all that "tech" doesn't scare me away so easily. You'd be suprised how scared some people are at "tech" stuff. This probally doesn't add anything but oh well. About becoming an eco-terrorist I have a few suggestions, don't put sugar in gas tanks, that doesn't kill anyone. a nice pound of plastique under the gas tank will make a nice big explosion. Just reroute the spark plug line to set off the plastique. They turn the key to start it and then Boom! If it is diesel vehicle then you are in trouble, no spark plugs. They do however use glow plugs to warm up the combustion chamber so a bit more work but still a big Boom! About the Kampfer suffix at the end of Grands Arms, I'm actually posting from the future (Thanks to Grand Arms Chrono), Panzer body got destroyed, but the Doc had the Kampfer body as a back up in case Panzer was disabled. This body is faster and has more firepower then the Panzer body. Nice Panzer Rifle on the right arm and a Panzer Defense/Offense Sheild system on the left arm. Going to have to get use to this much firepower and brute strength.

um... where to start...

Mary. Yes, I am a hipocrite. But if you think I don't hate every day that I live in Riverbend, you are sadly mistaken. There's actually a certain level of guilt hanging over me, knowing exactly what used to be on this land, and knowing what's there now. I recognize that all of Edmonton was built on prime farmland and wildlife habitat, I never said that it wasn't. But considering all the potential for infill and regeneration of already developed areas (or brownfields, etc) I do not see the point in taking up more and more of that prime farmland and wildlands. And, because I've learned this in classes (and I'm not expecting you all to know it), I know that the North East corner of the city is far superior in its farmland than the Southern side of the city. That doesn't mean I want to see more development on the South. I hate sprawl anywhere. If I could, I would move out of my parents' house now and live in one of the really old houses in the city core, or a loft, or anything that 's reusing already built structures. But I don't have the money for that at the moment, and even if I did that doesn't stop my parents from living in Riverbend now does it?

not that I really want to make this parallel, it just came to me and I felt like spitting it out: this whole discussion about "you can't be talking about this when you're part of it" makes me think about religion and how, for example, people can act all high-and mighty as Christians but still be committing sins, until the rug gets pulled out from under them and they realise that they are just as lowly and need to be as penitent as the next person. If the same rule that you're suggesting with your response to my previous statements applies to Christianity, only non-sinners can be Christians. People of every background can be environmentalists, they just have to recognise and work on their own shortcomings within that identity, just like Christians have to repent and seek forgiveness for their sins... though they keep on committing them. Just an example, and I'm only pulling out the whole Christian thing because it's something I'm familiar with and I didn't want to get the parallel wrong. I'm not trying to persecute anyone.

Yes, people in Alberta have made the stupid mistake of paving over and buiding upon some of the world's best farmland... other pieces of it have been turned into chemical wastelands too... none of that is good. People have to live somewhere, so they've built, and thus we have the cities and towns all over prime farmland and wildlife habitat right now. I can't change back what's already happened. But I can possibly change what's yet to come. That's why I think it's important that we stop and think about what's going on in other areas of the city... whether it's Ellerslie (some gorgeous wetland and wildlife habitat is gone, even a wildlife sanctuary and huge butterfly habitat were paved over for the Anthony Henday) or Horse Hills, it's all part of the city, and it's all worth preserving for more than its realestate value as houses and subdivisions... though we really haven't come up with a good accounting system for environmental benefits just yet. We've lost parts of our "Ribbon of Green" because the realestate value was just too high... even though it's a floodplain...

Tom Thanks for your paper. It was very interesting. Admittedly I didn't know too much about Little Mountain, just that it was lost. You have a good summation of everything and a great way of putting it down on paper.

In other areas of your discussions you mentioned my appearance as being two-faced, or perhaps just a 'good politician' (I detect that it came with a little contempt or irony too...). I have a problem: I can see why both sides (or multiple sides) to an argument are good, so it's hard for me to not give them equal weight, regardless of how I feel personally. I do not condone violence, but I can see where it would be useful. I do not support ecoterrorism, but I can see why people do it. (these are the kinds of statements that usually make me fail those pre-employment screening exams at places like grocery stores and video rental places) I am not ECOS, but people are going to think that I am, so it behooves me to act and speak in a certain way.

Regardless, even as an individual, I do not support the burning of new subdivisions, the sugaring of gas tanks or any of the other endless ecoterrorist possibilities. I would rather see the peaceful protests that have people forming human chains across roads into the Clayoquot Sound forests, or stopping developers in the city of Edmonton. I would rather see letter writing campaigns or people speaking to their representatives and making their voices heard. The small bit of marxist in me knows that violence is a solution we cannot discount, but it should only be a last resort, and I don't think ecoterrorism is the way to go about doing it anyway. The logic behind burning homes just surprises me. The amount of pollution being created by the burning of such horrid substances as vinyl siding (yes, we have it on our house, but that doesn't mean I like it), totally nullifies the point being made. And that's the same with every other form of eco terrorism. I'd rather see a tree-sit than tree spiking... same net effect - they can't cut down the trees - but at least with a sit, there's no chance of maiming the innocent forester. And I do see them as innocent, they're just as ordinary and regular as anyone else. We're all cogs in the machine and we need to fix the machine, but not by hurting the cogs.

Look, all I really want is dialogue and awareness. And I'd rather get that through peaceful means. The only violence I'm apt to condone is smacking Taylor over the head for suggesting such a bizarre fight as Tom versus me. Though I think I'll agree too that Tom is likely to win, seeing as the minute horniness comes into it, I usually get too creeped out to do anything but act defensively.