> Life is like biryani. You move the good stuff towards you & you push the weird shit to the side.  

post a new message


lorem ipsum

August 29, 2025 -- 2:20 PM
posted by ( )

Add an image    

Add a link


go back to maingo to old version

December 21, 2004 -- 10:07 AM
posted by eric

MTV ULTIMATE MASH UP: Hoobastank & R. Kelly

December 21, 2004 -- 10:03 AM
posted by ConeZone

MTV is starting up a new all Gay Channel.
Coincidentally they also have a new show show called "Malcolm in the Middle"

December 21, 2004 -- 12:24 AM
posted by eric

bon APE a tit

December 21, 2004 -- 12:01 AM
posted by eric

JOIN THE CONAN CREW!!!!

to join all you have to do is:
1) watch Conan every night
2) after which, pepper the board with the funniest shit you saw on the show
3) just wait for Paras to unravel

kay, good luck kids. start savin' those seeds!

December 20, 2004 -- 11:09 PM
posted by eric

hey guys. i officially have a dopeass new phone. perhaps by tommorow you can reach me at 970-2886. happy holidays bitches

December 20, 2004 -- 11:02 PM
posted by Par

Actually, I'm fairly certain PNGs are not licensed. And I just checked the wikipedia article. Blah blah, response to the termination of free licenses for JPEGs, shortcomings of GIFs (256 colour limitation), but yes, not-proprietary.

Actually, as far as I recall from my image processing days, the rule of thumb was JPEGs for photos, GIFs for logos. (And, apparently, PNGs for both.)

December 20, 2004 -- 10:51 PM
posted by nobody knows my face

No, Al, PSDs are huge too. They contain all the layer information and stuff. Depending on the complexity of the image, a PSD can often be much larger than a bitmap.

Here's how it stacks up:

  • PSDs: largest of the file formats, lossless quality, but easiest format to edit later. Contains multiple layer information.

  • BMPs: uncompressed picture file. pro: lossless quality, con: large save files

  • PCXs: similar to BMPs.

  • TIFFs/TIFs: Tagged Image File Format; smaller than BMPs (can be used with a number of compression algorithms), but with excellent image reproduction. This will cover your middle ground nicely when you can't decide if you want better image quality or smaller file sizes.

  • PNGs: (portable network graphics) similar in quality to TIFF files; I'm under the impression that it is a licensed format through Apple (most oldskool macs used pngs) which is becoming more common as almost all browsers are .png capable these days.

  • JPGs/JPEGs: compressed using LZH algorithms making for small file sizes, lossy reproduction, but ideal for photographic quality images

  • GIFs: compressed files using Compuserve's compression technology, ideal for graphic-quality cell-shaded images, pros: the gif82 format is capable of multi-frame animation as well as a transparency setting which can be applied to the first colour of the pallete. Cons: not as good as jpgs for photographic quality images pros: better in compression and reproduction of graphic images, making it useful for webpage design


    Also, that picture you drew looks awesome... I can already see improvement from the Grand Arms pic. My only crit though is that the background doesn't match how nicely you rendered the character.

  • December 20, 2004 -- 9:41 PM
    posted by Al

    What I wasted my day doing.



    Yep it is good not to go to university.

    December 20, 2004 -- 9:14 PM
    posted by Al

    Tay, think I still have a chance to win?

    December 20, 2004 -- 9:09 PM
    posted by Al

    Hey Tay, so only bmp are friggin huge? Psd are really small right?

    load more posts . . .